« Why Church Isn't Really a Church | Main | The Top 10 Churches in the World (by size) »
Thursday, May 26, 2005
Conflict? Ask Ken: Servant Leadership, Church Conflict, and the Hermeneutical Circle
The Problem All Church Leaders Face
A universally understood phenomenon in organizations is that information gets filtered out on the way up the chain of command. This is especially true of bad news. In congregations, leaders know less about member's thinking than they realize. What they do know is overly optimistic. The downside of this is that because legitimate issues are not addressed in a timely fashion, they become a source of unhappiness for those involved. And this problem increases as the church grows. The larger the church, the more its members live in the monologue of its leaders. Annual or even quarterly meetings are not sufficient return paths of feedback. There are too many people and not enough time. In reality, the only ones to whom members can fully express themselves are each other. In the absence of clear-cut avenues for communicating and processing concerns, members either live in silent frustration, leave the church, or complain to friends causing problems to metastasize.
The Hermeneutical Circle
The hermeneutical circle, a principle of interpretation, states that in order to accurately understand a passage, the interpreter must alternate between examining the most minute detail of the text and the global context in which it exists. It is a concept that relates to the interplay between the whole and the parts. A sentence, for example, makes no sense unless the reader knows the meaning of the words. Yet, the meaning of individual words can only be understood by the context in which they are found. Murray provides a helpful illustration. Consider the word “line.”
“Get to the back of the line, buddy.
The Bears' defensive line needs a lot of help this year.And that line drive is going to be caught!
He has always bought into the party line. (Political party)
Thank God they don't have party lines anymore.' (Several households sharing the same phone line.)
The telephone lines are down.
I couldn't draw a straight line if you paid me.
The line of communication between Jordan and Israel has been established.
Would you line up those glasses for me?”
Each sentence makes sense only by knowing the particular use and meaning of the word “line.” At the same time, the meaning of the word “line” is determined by its larger context. Hence, we see the “circular” relationship between the whole and the part. That is, it is only an understanding of the whole that gives meaning to the parts and it is only an understanding of the parts that gives meaning to the whole.
Servant Leadership, Church Conflict, and the Hermeneutical Circle
The concept of the hermeneutical circle nicely dovetails with the Biblical concept of Servant Leadership, that is, with the concept that church leaders both serve (Mark 10:42-45, John 13:12-15) and direct (Acts 20:17, 28-30, I Peter 5:1-4).
Leaders fulfill their mission when they proactively address the interpersonal concerns and conflicts of the people they serve. Rather than being seen as an aggravation that is best ignored, systematically attending to the squeaky wheels informs the chain of command where adjustments in top-down policies and current practices need to be made. Such responsiveness is critical to a successful ministry.
Moses (Exodus 18) and the disciples (Acts 6) each made policy decisions to better meet the needs of those under their care only after existing practices proved to be counter-productive. Their improved ministries resulted from problems at the bottom reaching the top and then “circling” back down again in the form of new guidelines.
For churches, there is no better way to create a servant leadership "circle" than by formally setting up a problem and conflict resolution system - with feedback to leadership. Leaders can then craft policies to better serve members. If it is true that without a vision people cast off restraint and create havoc, it is also true that resolving the organizational-related frustrations of the people supports the attainment of the vision.
Discussion
How effective has the leadership of churches you are or were part of been in pro-actively seeking to address the needs of frustrated members? What was done right for those of you whose experience has been positive? What was done wrong or failed to occur for those of you whose experience was less than positive?
--
© 2005 Kenneth C. Newberger
Ken Newberger, an experienced church conflict resolution specialist, earned his Th.M. from Dallas Theological Seminary, has ten years senior pastoral experience, and is in the dissertation phase for his Ph.D. in Conflict Analysis and Resolution at Nova Southeastern University, one of only two accredited doctoral programs of its kind in the United States. If your church needs help resolving conflict, if you need individual coaching, or if you would like to introduce a proactive conflict management system into your church, please visit Ken's website at www.ResolveChurchConflict.com or call 301-253-8877.
Pass this post on to a friend now...
Subscribe to RSS Feed | Get Email Notifications on New Posts
May 26, 2005 in Church Conflict | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451dafb69e200d8347c199069e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conflict? Ask Ken: Servant Leadership, Church Conflict, and the Hermeneutical Circle:
Comments
Not to pick something out of context but Ken said:
“For churches, there is no better way to create a servant leadership "circle" than by formally setting up a problem and conflict resolution system - with feedback to leadership. Leaders can then craft policies to better serve members.”
I read the article, but I can’t help but thinking that the leadership described here is nothing more then “Poll Driven Leadership!” Take a poll so we can find out were everyone is and then craft our ministries to fit their wishes and desires. If that is all we need then why even bring God into it! Last time I checked I don’t remember God asking me to fill out a poll so he could craft his will for my life according to my wants and desires!
You know I hate to tell all the “lets stop the conflict” crowd this, but living and serving Christ brings conflict! It is a rock of offence to preach that Christ demands 100% of our hearts and many people do not want to hear that message. And no amount of “frosting” on the Gospel is going to take away the offence of the Cross! “If a man wants to come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me!”
I would rather have my pastor concerned for the state of my soul and preach, lead and direct with that in mind then worry if I am comfortable sitting in an un-padded church pew!
Posted by: Al | May 26, 2005 10:25:11 AM
Well stated Al and I might add, where does the serving the wants and needs stop? When they finally decide to crucify you? or Go over to the next big church because something is "really happening" over there.
This isn't about serving men, it's about serving Christ (yeah but He commands us to love one another as He loved us - key word is love and the attributes like denying self, chastizing, rebuking, teaching, praying).
Al is right, we should be instructing people about thier eternal souls, not how comfortable they are or what they want the genie in the bottle to fix in their life.
There is a reformation coming and it will cause division. Christ's reformation divided a nation and people (the Jews) and continues to divide party lines (speaking of lines), churches, people, and beliefs.
Praise God there IS a line drawn in the sand but I guess it really depends on what side of the line you stand on how and why you'll praise Him.
Posted by: BeHim | May 26, 2005 1:41:51 PM
ARTICLE STATES:
Leaders fulfill their mission when they proactively address the interpersonal concerns and conflicts of the people they serve.
With Scripture to Glorify God yes, I agree but I doubt that taking this mission and broad brushing it with interpersonal concerns is hardly Biblical. Many/most (if not all) interpersonal concerns come from sin and the only way to truly proactively address a sinful concern is with Scripture, repentance and forgiveness.
DISCUSSION:
How effective has the leadership of churches you are or were part of been in pro-actively seeking to address the needs of frustrated members? What was done right for those of you whose experience has been positive? What was done wrong or failed to occur for those of you whose experience was less than positive?
Why are the members frustrated? What are they frustrated about? Who are they ULTIMATELY frustrated about? Man or God? Isn't it taught God is in control and has proviential domain over all things in our life (He directs our paths) so if we're frustrated, is it with man, or is it ultimately with God that we are frustrated?
Do I have a "right" to be frustrated? In the eyes and hearts of men, yes. But in the eyes of God, no. He is doing His Will and for a purpose. I either accept that or rebel against it.
Posted by: BeHim | May 26, 2005 2:07:36 PM
I see this whole issue as another example of the “feminization” of the “Man of God!” Where "feelings" are first and foremost and faith and righteousness are relegated to the “back of the bus!”
Posted by: Al | May 26, 2005 3:17:40 PM
Wrong... wrong... wrong - Al
I think your first desire of "not picking something out of context" was not met. To set up the straw man of Newberg trying to eliminate conflict is to miss his whole point.
His point is that conflict is inevitable and that how we respond to it reveals our approach to ministry. Either we are servant leaders or we are not. Newberg does not mention comfort... for the sake of the article I think we should give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he is discussing real, pressing conflict that those in the Pastoral positions would want to know about. The fact that many ministers employ the "my way or the highway" approach to serving their flock is oxymoronic. Heavy on the moronic.
Now, Al, I don't want to take you out of context either. So, have at me... I just think you needed to employ some hermeneutics on that article. I think your interpretation has been skewed by past experience.
Posted by: Lance | May 26, 2005 3:35:16 PM
Leaving the Hermeneutical Circle behind, how about creating a "Vicious Circle": if we truly had submissive, humble hearts (servant hearts, if you will), how in the world would anything of any value get done? Does anyone really believe submission is the way to get the job done? (Seems to me its hard to characterize Jesus' life any other way.) What would it be like if we were all in a mode of submission (minimizing egos and agendas) and maximizing Jesus (mercy, grace, love)?
Somewhere it says, "____ plants, ____ waters, but God causes the increase" (in a truly fractured church. And somewhere else, "God is the builder of everything" (in a suffering church). Is it possible we take ourselves and our opinions, beliefs and viewpoints way too seriously?
Posted by: Larry | May 26, 2005 4:38:40 PM
Lance – wrong, wrong, wrong!
I am not reading anything into this article - All I said is what this type of article leads me to think! I quote myself; "I read the article, but I can’t help but thinking that the leadership described here is nothing more then “Poll Driven Leadership!”
What I have seen in my 28 years of ministry is just that - "poll driven leadership." I believe while that might look "spiritual" it misses the boat about what the Gospel is all about – FREEDOM! While it might look like it is dealing with “problems” or “conflicts” in the church – it is really just “batting at the air” and not dealing with the real cause of all problems – the hearts of men.
Last, I am not indicting Ken here, in fact I like what Ken has to say and have spoken with Ken about church conflict plans and resolutions. My concern isn’t with Ken, my concern is with all the “pandering of sin” our contemporary church is engaged all for the mighty “purpose” – making the Gospel palatable to the sinner!
Blessings,
Al
Posted by: Al | May 26, 2005 5:32:16 PM
"How effective has the leadership of churches you are or were part of been in pro-actively seeking to address the needs of frustrated members? What was done right for those of you whose experience has been positive? What was done wrong or failed to occur for those of you whose experience was less than positive?"
A lot of it depends on how you define "needs". An overwhelming need that I have is to be able to serve with the gifts that God gave me. My driving desire is to work with single adults (and yes, I've been in leadership positions - only in groups of married women, which I no longer am).
When the "needs" of a "frustrated member" are others-oriented, it is different than when a member's needs are I-oriented.
the effectiveness of the attempt to address frustrated members depends a lot on the source of the frustration.
Posted by: Ellen | May 26, 2005 6:07:26 PM
Al,
So, when the disciples addressed the problems of the people who were not being served in Acts... were they pandering?
It would seem that in your opinion, the apostles should've just given those Helenized believers a good dose of truth about selfishness. However, if they had "spiritualized" the issue and not dealt with the real world problem of preferential treatment in the church (an unhealthy reality in some churches today) then they would have missed out on Stephen... and on devoting themselves to prayer and ministry.
There is one other fatal flaw to your argument. The thought that one man in the church has all the information needed to fulfill the mission of that church to the community is a dangerous road to travel.
That sounds like a Jim Jones kind of road.
Al, here is where I think we can find some common ground. There are definitely two sides to this coin: 1)Church members operating from the flesh and their people pleasing pastors who have become a doormat for them and 2)Church leaders who only hear good news and attribute any conflict as "getting in the flesh" I believe that Ken's angle on this is to abusive (or ignorant) church leaders who abuse their "power" to shove the will of God (building plan, new hire, church relocation, name change) down the throats of congregants.
I didn't appreciate the exclamation point after your trinity of wrongs... ;)
BTW: "spiritualized" means hyper-spiritualized... I think they dealt with the situation in a very spiritual/real world way.
Blessings right back at ya
Until the party,
Lance
Posted by: Lance | May 26, 2005 6:34:32 PM
Lance, Right, Right, Right!
If only our problems in the church today were as difficult as providing food for the needy! :)
I can agree on your statements of agreement! With one caveat…it would bless me to no end to see our churches – Mine Included – deal with the real issues people face then deliberating intensely over the color of the carpets! :)
I’ll try to avoid the !!!!!! points in the future! :-)
Thanks for the blessings,
Al
Posted by: Al | May 26, 2005 7:26:33 PM
"it would bless me to no end to see our churches – Mine Included – deal with the real issues people face then deliberating intensely over the color of the carpets!"
Or latte machines...
from the research I've done (with single adults), in *many* (not all) churches, the needs of this segment of adults can be largely ignored; the newly divorced especially so.
there are *real* needs (not "felt needs" that the "visible church" should be helping the bride of Christ to meet.
this can be done in many ways, but if the needs are ignored, that is not a good thing.
Posted by: Ellen | May 26, 2005 8:06:23 PM
Al,
I couldn't agree more... now the only thing is deciding what perceived needs are trivial and what's legitimate.
Thanks for the response.
You are the man!
lance
Posted by: Lance | May 26, 2005 9:51:20 PM
[I couldn't agree more... now the only thing is deciding what perceived needs are trivial and what's legitimate.]
Or, put another way:
Which needs/wants are essential to the Body of Christ (like Discipleship) and which needs/wants are non-essential to the Body of Christ (like color of carpets and latte machines).
One we MUST deal with and the other is something to consider over time (after all, in the larger scope of life, carpets and coffee are of no real concern - nor is money BUT discipleship and spiritual growth in knowledge and understanding of the Word is of vast eternal concern).
Posted by: BeHim | May 27, 2005 5:30:21 PM
