« 10 Advantages of Doing Ministry Without a Ministry Strategy | Main | New Friday Feature: Ask the ChurchStaffing/MMI Guy! »
Thursday, June 09, 2005
Conflict: Ask Ken: Why Does Church Conflict End as Badly as it Does?
The Physical World
A pocket watch illustrates a physical law which Einstein considered the premier law of all science. It is called the second law of thermodynamics. Not being a scientist, I will state the law in layman’s terms. In closed systems, there is an irreversible tendency for matter and energy to move from order to disorder. That is, systems or things that are not open to input from the outside rundown, breakdown, and become less and less useful. Houses fall into disrepair, cars stop working, and watches wind down and stop. Unless a carpenter reinforces or rebuilds an old structure, unless the auto shop replaces the rusted metal or repairs the broken component, unless someone winds up the pocket watch, those things which were once in excellent working order become useless. Over time, what was once “perfect” becomes non-functional. This invariable movement toward disintegration is what the second law of thermodynamics is all about.
Church Conflict
When it comes to addressing ongoing, unresolved conflict in the church, one of the most oft-stated refrains church leaders make is, “we’ll take care of it on our own.” And what typically happens next as the circle draws tighter? Relationships breakdown even further. The statements made by two church members are typical: (1) “No one would admit there was a problem until it was way out of control.” (2) “At the annual Business Meeting we were shocked to find out that there were deep and hard feelings between church members and the pastor."
Why is such an unhappy spiraling of events so common as a pattern of church conflict? A short answer is because the conflict has become closed. Over time, parties have become "antagonists" (from the Greek word which means “to struggle against,” as in Hebrews 12:4). When people lock horns, their world narrows. An intense power struggle follows. Eventually, it spills into and embroils the rest of the congregation to the detriment of all.
This is nothing new to conflict resolution theorists who, for years, have recognized the inherent negative interpersonal dynamics of closed systems.
“Direct negotiations have a limited usefulness once the level of conflict has
escalated in intensity" (David Augsburger).
“Once in a fight, each side finds it difficult to accept the ideas of the enemy” (Louis Kriesberg).
“A proposal that is unacceptable coming from you [an adversary] may be acceptable if it comes from a third party” (William Ury).
“[Direct, two-party] negotiations are hard to sustain and frequently break down, so that the next resort is usually coercive self-help” (Kevin Avruch).
The Lesson from a Pocket Watch
A simple observation of a pocket watch makes clear that agency other than the moving parts of the watch itself has to wind the timepiece up in order for it to properly function. For those whose churches are experiencing ongoing, unresolved conflict, it is a mistake to think that with just a little more time, everything will get better. Closed systems don’t get better. They get worse. Eventually, they stop working altogether. The truth is, if matters in the church could have been satisfactorily resolved by those involved, they would have been. But since the problem has only become more intractable, another approach is desperately needed.
For churches stymied by conflict, the best way to reverse the trend toward social disintegration is by calling upon the outside assistance of one trained to positively impact such systems. Only with the infusion of energy from outside the system are matters within the system more likely to improve and stabilize. Such is the lesson from a pocket watch.
FOR OTHER ARTICLES BY KEN ON CHURCH CONFLICT... click here
--
© 2005 Kenneth C. Newberger
Ken Newberger, an experienced church conflict resolution specialist, earned his Th.M. from Dallas Theological Seminary, has ten years senior pastoral experience, and is in the dissertation phase for his Ph.D. in Conflict Analysis and Resolution at Nova Southeastern University, one of only two accredited doctoral programs of its kind in the United States. If your church needs help resolving conflict, if you need individual coaching, or if you would like to introduce a proactive conflict management system into your church, please visit Ken's website at www.ResolveChurchConflict.com or call 301-253-8877.
Pass this post on to a friend now...
Subscribe to RSS Feed | Get Email Notifications on New Posts
June 9, 2005 in Church Conflict | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/131723/2616284
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conflict: Ask Ken: Why Does Church Conflict End as Badly as it Does?:
Comments
I think we should also focus on "conflict prevention" rather than just "conflict resolution." It's much better, cheaper, etc. to avoid confrontational mistakes rather than create them through unnecessary actions and then have to fix them.
Prevention is done by learning how to operate in love. One of the biggest life-changing books I've read is "The Five Love Langauges":
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1881273156/qid=1118342162/sr=8-4/ref=pd_csp_4/104-5736630-7093557?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
...Bernie
http://www.freegoodnews.com/logos/
Posted by: bernie dehler | Jun 9, 2005 2:38:40 PM
Bernie,
I disagree that conflict can be prevented by operating in love... this side of heaven.
It is an ideal, but not a reality. In order for "conflict prevention" to happen, there would have to be an infinite quantity of resources and time (i.e. heaven) and everyone (I mean every individual) would have to be operating out of love (i.e. heaven).
While teaching the church (and individuals in the church) how to behave in love (and caring enough to learn someones love language) is a commandment of our Lord... I don't think that Jesus ever thought that emulating Him would eliminate conflict from our lives. He spoke often of the world (or those who have bought into the culture) hating true Christ-followers. We also know that sometimes those people reside in our churches. We also know that sometimes (gasp!), we are those people. Operating in love ourselves ALWAYS would solve one half of that equation... but we can never control how we are seen (or interpreted) by others.
Just some thoughts.
Posted by: Lance | Jun 9, 2005 6:50:16 PM
Hi Lance-
I know love won't solve all problems, it's just that it can prevent many from starting in the first place. It's also builds a climate/culture/environment where problems can be resolved easier. ...not enough love in this world, or even in churches... and Jesus said that we should be known by our love...
...Bernie
http://www.freegoodnews.com/logos/
Posted by: bernie dehler | Jun 9, 2005 7:14:38 PM
Why is such an unhappy spiraling of events so common as a pattern of church conflict?
Four things in my opinion:
1. Expectations
2. Frustration
3. Unrepentance
4. Unforgiveness
Why is it so common? - It is natural to rebel against the Expectations of God (obedience).
For churches stymied by conflict, the best way to reverse the trend toward social disintegration is by calling upon the outside assistance of one trained to positively impact such systems.
I would only add: "is by calling one Biblically trained and Assisted to positively impact such systems."
Like Paul the Apostle. When conflict arose (usually against The Gospel) Paul would go to the Scriptures ("what does Scripture say"). This puts the control and power back in The Hands of the One who deserves them.
Posted by: BeHim | Jun 10, 2005 12:38:15 AM
I'm surprised at the number of people that don't like the idea of nouthetic counseling - even the pastorate. How can going to the Bible for answers to questions be a bad thing?
but...I think we're so into a mindset of "damage" and not "sin" that we want to fix things, not let God fix things.
Posted by: ellen | Jun 10, 2005 3:28:01 AM
In many situations there is a problem with verbal statements of love--I love you, we appreciate you, we are glad you are here, etc.
and nonverbal actions of rejection--phone calls take days to respond to, promises are not kept repeatedly, attemts to serve in the church are rebuffed, postponed, etc. this kind of discordant behavior by a pastor is very hard on a person, and I suspect that is is not intentional much of the time.
Outside counseling can really help to limit this kind of behavior and help prevent problems from being kept alive longer than absolutely necessary
Posted by: jim | Jun 10, 2005 8:21:32 AM
Jim, this kind of *perceived* behavior on anybody's part (taken together - we love you and we're glad you're here and now we're going to ignore you for a while) is harmful. I'm using the word "perceived", a reminder that what we perceive (feel) is not always accurate.
tying this in with another thread (havinga plan) - one of the few places the church I belong to falls short is in the adult singles area, where I feel *very* called to serve. I went to the pastorate and was told that there are no plans for that.
when a church teaches that we are to "listen to the Holy Spirit and obey", and tells you to find out where your gifts are and use them there, but...
I'm working at finding a niche, with God's help, but it can be frustrating. My prayer is: the church will find a "plan" for singles - I may or may not be a part of it and that's okay. If I was useful to God in planting that seed - that's a good thing.
The discord in the *perceived* nonchalance toward singles still stings at times - I sometimes feel like a non-entity, with today's "focus on the family" and all...
anyway...
Posted by: Ellen | Jun 10, 2005 8:45:57 AM
conflict in the church is largely the result of incompetent leadership on any and all levels. The only churches who deal with conflict "well" are churches with leaders wise enough to implement serious, real-world models for conflict mediation.
My guess is that too many pastors try to rely on biblical knowledge and personal charisma ( pardon the expression!) alone.
Posted by: vincent | May 6, 2006 9:27:34 PM
I was a soldier for 20 years before I entered the ministry. I know that human organizations suffer from the same types of conflct. I learned long ago the idea of "nipping it in the bud" to a lot of problems. Identify the source, go to the source, seek resolution, move on. Jesus taught this similarly when He told His disciples about a brother having something against another...set down the gift, don't worship, get 'er done quickly.
A lot of conflict revolves around miscommunication and perceptions or expectations that are frustrated.
One cannot always prevent conflict. There are some ornery people in the pews (as were in the platoon). They have their own agenda. They can be slick, treacherous, and mean. They can be well camouflaged. I have learned to identify them early, to try to win them over, but not to be afraid to stand up to them when they try to stir up trouble. Again, the method of Jesus works. You have to love them but when the church is in danger, you have to love the church more and protect it.
Posted by: Dan Moore | May 7, 2006 8:41:37 AM
Some conflict can be very good--for all parties involved.
But only if it is done biblically, following ALL the principles of the New Testament in relationships--not just the ones that make us look good.
Posted by: Phil Hoover-Chicago | May 8, 2006 9:11:08 AM
